Month: August 2012

  • MY WAY 23: FIRST, IT WAS NO BULLET TRAIN FOR FLORIDA, NOW, IT’S AGAINST WOMEN, PARENTS AND FAMILIES?

    FIRST, IT WAS NO BULLET TRAIN FOR FLORIDA, NOW, IT’S AGAINST WOMEN,

    PARENTS AND FAMILIES?

    Florida Governor Scott rejected the money that was made available for the famous and dead bullet train project. Now, the Florida Legislature has sent back another piece of federal money: $ 4.9 million. Yes, another hit. Now it’s against programs around the state that provide in-home visits to parents in areas with high rates of premature babies, poverty, crime, substance abuse, joblessness, child abuse and other issues. These in-home visits are designed to combat those problems by deploying professionals who teach parenting and other skills.

    Now you tell me what is wrong with this, especially in these times. The Florida Legislature decided to reject the money and have it given to other state. One legislator stated that private, faith-based groups should have a bigger role helping parents. This is probably true, but in these economic times these groups do not have the means to provide this type of specialized service.

    So what is the REAL reason for all of this?  DAMM POLITICS and DAMM POLITICIANS.

    These people in Congress and most of our governors and state legislators, no matter what party you belong to only think of themselves and how far they need to go to “buy” votes. It is a true discrace and shame to have come to a point where the political discourse in this country has become more a fight between animals with no respect for humans at all. So, this will probably end the day we get rid of ALL of them. The owners of the circus and their animals are coming to town to show how fierce they are….the same thing will be repeated the week after in Charlotte. The end result: there is no hope for the poor and for those that can’t defend themselves in this country. Yes, WE ARE A THIRD WORLD COUNTRY!!

    See you next week!

     

  • My Way 22 WHY DO POLITICAL PARTIES HAVE CONVENTIONS?

    WHY DO POLITICAL PARTIES HAVE CONVENTIONS?

    The time is almost upon us, when the Democrats and Republicans will get together for their respective conventions. Each candidate will get a post-convention polling bounce that will fade a week later. It happens every year. It is a ritual that sometimes seems irrelevant — and other times seems important? Do political conventions still matter? It is said that initially, the purpose of a political convention is to give the citizens more of a say in selecting their parties’ candidate. Is this really true? And worse of all, we are the ones paying for this huge, big, all scripted, good for nothing parties!

    According to Brian Faler (http://go.bloomberg.com/political-capital/2012-06-08/who-pays-for-the-conventions-we-all-do/) the events where President Obama and Republican Mitt Romney will receive their parties’ official nominations costs $136 million. And Congress doles out the money.

    Where does the cash go? Faler explains $100 million pays for security at both conventions, plus $18 million for each party to pay for such things as balloons and signs — and even alcohol. The money was designed to reduce the influence of campaign contributions. But with lawmakers’ promises to cut the government’s $1.2 trillion deficit, Senator Tom Coburn said both parties ought to say “no thanks” to the cash.
    Think of this…with all the problems we have in this country; the economy in shambles, unemployment and an inoperable Congress, look where all this money is going! Especially when we don’t need any convention…WE ALREADY KNOW WHO THE CANDIDATES WILL BE!
    This is just another example to show you that, we live in a ME world where greed, power and stupidity tend to use and abuse all of those out of Washington, no matter the party. By the way, the County is spending 400k for the inaugural party to promote Hillsborough County Tourism. That’s good, except THE PARTY IS IN ST. PETE!

    See you next week.

     

  • My Way 21: Should you register to vote?

    We have reached number 21. Thanks to all that read our blog and write to us. Your ideas are appreciated. Someone asked me, why vote?, why even bother/. I found an interesting article that I want to share with all of you about voter registration;

    Should You Register to Vote?

    By Ann DeLaney

    Many of us — more than 50 million citizens in this country — are eligible to vote, but do not bother to register. Every citizen of the U. S. over the age of 18 is eligible to register and vote.

    In all but four states, you must register before Election Day in order to vote. Maine, Minnesota, and Wisconsin allow their citizens to register on Election Day. North Dakota is the most voter-friendly of all — it doesn’t require you to register at all!

    Every other state requires registration in advance of Election Day. Most states close the registration period 30 days before they hold the election. You must be registered in order to vote for any elective office in the U. S., from president to township advisory board. You only have to register once as long as you live at the same address and vote now and again.

    Upsides and downsides of registering

    Maybe you’re not registered because you’ve convinced yourself that you should avoid politics. However, avoiding politics is not possible. Political decisions will be made for you even if you elect not to participate. You still have to pay taxes even if you don’t vote. Elected officials make decisions about which streets get paved, which sidewalks get repaired, and which schools close without regard to your opinions, if you don’t vote. There is no hole deep enough for you to bury your head in to avoid politics completely. You can’t run, and you can’t hide — so you may as well participate.

    Make a difference

    If you do participate, you can make the system better. It may never be perfect, but improvement is possible. You have the power to make your elected officials respond to you. Your voice will be loud enough to be heard by everyone.

    Voting is a valuable right that you, as an American, have. Many Americans take that right for granted . . . even the politicians. In the 1994 elections, a wave of voter reaction — a “throw ’em all out” after years of inaction and deadlock by Congress — shook up both major political parties, changed the dominant party in Congress, and made the politicians brutally aware of the issues about which voters had been concerned for years, and which the politicians had bypassed. That reaction reminded every politician not to take the voters for granted. The politicians heard the discontentment among voters, and they had to respond.

    Become important

    In truth, there are so many compelling reasons to vote in our country, it’s a wonder the voting turnout here doesn’t come close to approaching that of the countries that demand it.

    When you vote and participate, elected officials have to consider what you think. They may not always do what you want, but they have to listen to your opinions. When you vote, you become someone important.

    Cynics are probably saying, “Yeah, but not as important as PACs and special interest groups with money.” Keep in mind, though, that a district (be it a small town or the entire country) has only so many voters. Although money is in potentially limitless supply for a candidate (it can be raised from many sources), it’s illegal to buy votes, and you can’t give someone else your proxy to vote for you; so the number of votes cast in any election is finite. You and only you can cast your vote. Your vote has the same weight as the vote of every other citizen. Rich or poor, young or old, male or female, black or white, each vote is equally important.

    Political power

    Each American has the same number of votes. You may not have an equal share of the world’s financial resources, but the secret ballot gives us all an equal amount of voting power. Each registered voter has one and only one vote to cast — regardless of what you hear to the contrary about certain big-city or downstate rural districts, where the concept of “vote early and vote often” is allegedly in force, or where that age-old question — “Is there voting after death?” — is supposedly answered in the affirmative.

    A person who has contributed $1 million to a candidate counts for no more than the vote of the person who has given nothing to a campaign. After all, winning elections is all about getting a majority of the votes cast. Secret ballots like the one in the U.S., do not permit unequal weight to be attached to a certain person’s vote. Votes are one-size-fits-all. Politicians need the votes of the “little people,” and there are more “little people” than there are rich and powerful ones.

    Since John F. Kennedy was elected, the percentage of eligible voters participating in presidential elections has declined in almost every election. That is true in local elections as well.

    When we all vote, we are a powerful force that can move mountains, or at least politicians. When we don’t, the small number of special interest voters have more clout because they are a bigger percentage of a smaller pie.

    Lets just register and VOTE!!

     

    See you next week!

     

     

  • My way # 20 MAYBE WE COULD LOOK AT THE FRENCH TAX REFORM MODEL?

    Sorry, we could not work on our blog last week due to technical problems…but here’s this week’s…enjoy and comment:

    MAYBE WE COULD LOOK AT THE FRENCH TAX REFORM MODEL?

    I was reading about the tax changes proposed by French president François Hollande and, even though nobody likes tax hikes, his government has made some points that, in my opinion, could be considered:

    WEALTH TAX: this is a tax that will have its highest effect on those that make whose net taxable assets are over 1, 623,000 dollars. The following table explains it better:

    Net taxable asset value rate                      %
    Less than 992,000 dollars 0.00
    Between 992,000 and 1,623,000 dollars 0.55
    Between 1,623,000 and 3,184,000 0.75
    Between 3,184,000 and 5,006,000 dollars 1.00
    Between 5,006,000 and 9,552,000 dollars 1.30
    Between 9,552,000 and 20,800,000 dollars 1.65
    Above 20,800,000 dollars 1.80

    So, if you make less than a million dollars, your taxes will stay the same. Other subtle changes have also taken place: Mr. Hollande has actually taken the train ride around France; he also used the train to go to Brussels, without the need of flying or having a state jet following him, and his ministers have been ordered to hit the rails when possible (with a free pass on the national railway system).

    Ministers and other government officials have been encouraged (ordered) that if they need to fly, to use in coach class on commercial airlines. Why does a congressperson need a private airplane?  Official cars have been diminished in size and in luxury. Mr. Hollande has given up the presidential Citroën C6 for a smaller but hardly shabby Citroën DS5 diesel hybrid. He has reduced the ranks of his official drivers to two from three, and they are now supposed to stop at red lights. French Prime Minister Ayrault gave up his C6 for a cheaper Peugeot 508. Cabinet ministers have also traded down, and the housing minister, Cécile Duflot, an ecologist who was criticized for wearing jeans to an Élysée Palace meeting, has ordered four official bicycles.

    Champagne at receptions has largely been replaced by Muscadet, a considerably cheaper white wine, and prices at the official cafeterias for ministerial employees, always a bargain, have been raised modestly.

    Even security has been put to the knife, at least a little. Junior ministers no longer get bodyguards, and the number of security workers attached to the presidency has been reduced by a third.

    In general, Mr. Ayrault has ordered his ministers to reduce their official budgets sharply, by 7 percent in 2013 and by an additional 4 percent in each of the next two years.

    As he promised during the campaign, Mr. Hollande has cut ministerial salaries by 30 percent (including his own, to $18,000 a month from $26,000). And for the first time, the salaries of ministers cannot exceed the prime minister’s salary, which is about $16,000 a month. Pierre Moscovici, the finance minister, told L’Express that “my salary is lower than that of my chief of staff, 12,000 euros, and of a few hundred of the civil servants” at the ministry. That is about $14,600 a month.

    It has also been stated that these tax increases would be in effect until 2017, when the government should have a balances budget.

    Maybe we should consider some of these things and think about them. We know this will not happen here because our GREED, but I just thought to throw it out there for you to be informed. Little tweaks can go a long way. See you next week

    References

    http://www.businessinsider.com/francois-hollande-rises-tax-to-75-2012-8

    http://siddalls.wordpress.com/2012/07/11/hollande-government-tax-proposals/